Videos with tag testing
Results 1-8 of 16
 
18:36
18:36
18:36

Top-Dowom Reuse for Multi-Level Testing

Reference to the Paper: Marrero Pérez, Abel; Kaiser, Stefan.(2010). “Top-Down Reuse for Multi-level Testing ,” Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS), 2010 17th IEEE International Conference and Workshops, pp. 150 – 159. Link for the Paper: http://0-ieeexplore.ieee.org.aupac.lib.athabascau.ca/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5457775

Added: 2737 days ago by jdelaney

Views: 189 | Comments: 0 | Not yet rated

 
19:57
19:57
19:57

Does Adaptive Random Testing Deliver a Higher Confidence tha

T. Chen, F. Kuo, H. Liu, and W. Wong. Does Adaptive Random Testing Deliver a Higher Confidence than Random Testing?. In the Eighth International Conference on Quality Software, pp. 145-154, August 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2008.23

Added: 2738 days ago by johnka15

Views: 1050 | Comments: 0 | Not yet rated

 
20:40
20:40
20:40

Automated Discovery of Race Condition Failures ...

Multi-threaded applications are commonplace in today’s software landscape. Pushing the boundaries of concurrency and parallelism, programmers are maximizing performance demanded by stakeholders. However, multi-threaded programs are challenging to test and debug. Prone to their own set of unique faults, such as race conditions, testers are turning to automated validation tools for assistance. This paper’s main contribution is a new algorithm called multi-stage novelty filtering (MSNF) that can aid in the discovery of race failures as well as handle anomaly detection in general. MSNF stresses tool simplicity requiring minimal configuration, no data preprocessing or software metrics, and the ability to adapt to its environment. The paper begins with the importance of testing tool simplicity. It then gives an overview of the support vector machine, a machine learning technique chosen to achieve adaptability. The paper then formulates the MSNF algorithm, empirical results are discussed, and challenges with the proposed solution investigated. Future research offers direction for taking MSNF from theory to practice. Finally, MSNF is compared to related works. The conclusion is preliminary results show promise, but MSNF requires more research before it can be implemented in a useful testing tool.

Added: 2917 days ago by jcuzzola

Views: 554 | Comments: 0 | Not yet rated

 
20:29
20:29
20:29

Automatic system testing of programs without test oracles

Murphy, C., Shen, K., and Kaiser, G. 2009. Automatic system testing of programs without test oracles. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth international Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (Chicago, IL, USA, July 19 - 23, 2009). ISSTA '09. ACM, New York, NY, 189-200. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1572272.1572295

Added: 2981 days ago by jcuzzola

Views: 249 | Comments: 0 | Not yet rated

 
14:32
14:32
14:32

Test Case Prioritization Based on Varying Testing Requiremen

Added: 2987 days ago by ruthbl

Views: 445 | Comments: 0 | Not yet rated

 
20:30
20:30
20:30

Towards a BPEL Unit Testing Framework

A framework for the organization, management and execution of unit tests against BPEL compositions.

Added: 2988 days ago by under_score

Views: 623 | Comments: 0 | Not yet rated

 
18:56
18:56
18:56

A Research Agenda for Distributed Software Development

Sengupta, B., Chandra, S., and Sinha, V.,

Added: 3107 days ago by twang

Views: 247 | Comments: 0 | star star star star star star star star 

 
18:20
18:20
18:20

Asking & Answering Question during a Programming Task Change

Jonathan Sillito, Gail C. Murphy, Kris De Volder, "Asking and Answering Questions during a Programming Change Task," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2008, pp. 434-451, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2008.26

Added: 3346 days ago by dipanda

Views: 361 | Comments: 0 | Not yet rated